Asrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 11:28
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 804
83% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
88% 109 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 105
Splatting 103
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 255 200 225 138 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 474
Mixed 346
SusWrite 205
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.3
183% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 244
196% 275 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
153GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 474 491 486 390 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 465
Mixed 421
SusWrite 442
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 64.3
216% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Verbatim Desktop HDD 3.0 6TB
5TB free, PID 0415
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 188 190 189 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Read 183
Write 183
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 186
216% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
750GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 85.8
Write 86.7
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 86.6
113% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
180GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 90.4
Write 112
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 118
124% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 30.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 30.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0D92 S24D330
Typical B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback