MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 04:02
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,138
100% 852 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 277
Parallax 207
190% 239 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 153
Splatting 125
138% 175 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
513GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 881 933 1114 1074 499 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 500GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 446 456 455 450 444 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 3 479GB
409GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 192 171 166 218 229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 612
Write 706
Mixed 229
SusWrite 239
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 13.7
44% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 36
47% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
923GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 186 188 185 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 147
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 185
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$129
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 41.1
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 19% 128 530 427 120 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
History: Score 24: 0P 2R 4G 2B | Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback