MSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 02:02
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 547
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 111
Parallax 118
103% 119 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 82.9
83% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1030 1TB SSD
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 153 156 173 360 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 950
Write 993
Mixed 996
SusWrite 200
176% 785 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 43.2
155% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 708
484% 596 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 122%
Great: 279%
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 255 243 244 243 242 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 454
Write 421
Mixed 387
SusWrite 267
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 34.1
119% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 323
248% 337 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
2TB free
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 249 169 181 168 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 413
Write 354
Mixed 280
SusWrite 214
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 13.8
64% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 32.7
47% 87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Liteon IT LCS-128M6S 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: DC73103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 310 311 296 309 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 312
Mixed 274
SusWrite 306
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 30.1
113% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 206
187% 285 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 91%
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: DC70106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 305 308 312 295 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 453
Write 309
Mixed 262
SusWrite 304
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 30.8
117% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 197
182% 279 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
228GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 79.8
Mixed 58.3
102% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.2
93% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 60 24" 1280 720 ACR02FF G246HL
Typical H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $587
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback