MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '16 at 05:33
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 970
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 86.1
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 102
52% 80 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 198
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 XT
XFX(1682 2177) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.69 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 3.38
10% 9.61 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 15.9
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 306
Write 290
Mixed 271
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 13.2
75% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 39.1
75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD75 00AARS-00Y5B 750GB
491GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 93.5
Write 76
Mixed 76.3
62% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.18
48% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 60.7
Mixed 59.8
45% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.39
107% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Seagate Wireless Plus 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a314
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 107
Write 113
Mixed 103
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.31
78% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback