Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory117.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 22:43
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 31 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1136
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,916
180% 2,916 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP FX900 Pro 1TB
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.A.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3822 3904 3900 3821 3757 2597 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB
380GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 175 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 106
Write 125
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 173
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.4
352% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 117%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
194GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 77 75 77 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 75.6
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 86%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
17GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 8,431
Mixed 5.2
2,777% 4,218 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Mixed 0
221% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G36C16U4BL.M16FB 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 60.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 62.2
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 35.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 138%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback