Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory31.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 173
2-Core 334
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 1,169
111% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,559
96% 1,559 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Sapphire(1DA2 E439) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 166
Parallax 369
140% 235 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 180
Splatting 239
195% 239 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 476 475 484 387 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 460
Mixed 430
SusWrite 392
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.8
190% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
701GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 97
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 148 148 149 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 161
Write 162
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 148
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 193 120 167 188 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 104
Write 88.9
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 164
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.1
288% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 91 89 84 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 62.8
Write 89.2
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 87.6
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 135 138 138 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 85.6
Write 125
Mixed 102
SusWrite 133
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
405% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 97%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
576GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 94.4
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 97.4
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 99%
Initio 3639S 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0057
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 36.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 37.3
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
447% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
77GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 26.3
38% 31 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
13GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 48 56 48 55 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 1.2
Write 15
Mixed 3
SusWrite 51.7
28% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 20.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 23.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 50 84.6" 2560 1417 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical AB350M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback