Alphasync 1538322

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlphasync 1538322  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A520M-K
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 12:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 836
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 67.7
55% 69.6 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 66.8
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 130 59 63 91 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 1,033
Write 336
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 83.5
83% 384 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 6.3
75% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 585
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 119
138% 254 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 Adata 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.3% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 23.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical 1538322 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alphasync 1538322

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback