QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory5.93GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5.93GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2 GB free of 5.93262 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U Graphics
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 34
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
60% 117 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 385
48% 366 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 872
Write 559
Mixed 676
156% 702 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 10.4
35% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 73.8
63% 92 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x5GB
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 7 4 64 0" 1920 1080
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback