bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77KC
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime16 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 11:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 154
58% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 292
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 19.1
18% 20.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S37A90G 90GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 78 74 77 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 160
Write 90.5
Mixed 114
SusWrite 75.5
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 21.8
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 104
82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
395GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 121 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 116
Write 124
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HLV-PC12800D3-8G Micron 16GB
1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 12.6" 1440 900 NCS2275
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback