MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,021
96% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,525
94% 1,525 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 30.5
16% 21.2 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 29
Splatting 23.1
17% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V900/128G 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1206A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 31 57 29 36 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 503
Write 369
Mixed 407
SusWrite 54.4
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 1
81% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 34.9
44% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 176%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
46GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 55.6
Mixed 42
SusWrite 75.2
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 58%
Generic External 250GB
83GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 52.6
Write 30.7
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 35
45% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MSD48G26Q3 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 19" 1280 720 HAN1900 MCT-19HDMI
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback