HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cf2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8658
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 06:07
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 172
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 209
30% 219 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8658) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 5.2
4% 4 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 200 159 30 176 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,373
Write 1,097
Mixed 733
SusWrite 128
185% 833 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 57.8
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 264
213% 299 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 127%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1ME-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 1.1
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 40 15 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1413
Typical Laptop 14-cf2xxx Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback