Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 195 67% 121 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 568 55% 453 Pts	64-Core 574 36% 574 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 187 Parallax 114 90% 137 fps	MRender 93.4 Gravity 122 Splatting 111 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Glowy 120GB 120GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R3G5P SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 365 327 167 167 190 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 349 Write 363 Mixed 303 SusWrite 260 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 21.1 74% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 56.7 DQ Write 37.7 DQ Mixed 48.5 36% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 81%
Kuijia DK500/128G 128GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 59GB free Firmware: 2101XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 370 355 144 81 61 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 430 Write 383 Mixed 349 SusWrite 228 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 33.5 119% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 207 157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 237GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 97 95 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63% Good	Read 124 Write 121 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 95 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax GLJG42F-D8KFFA------ Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	59	144	24"	1280 720	ACR050E Acer XB241H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	877x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	720x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $78Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	547x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	463x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	430x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	407x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	206x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $45Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	157x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	154x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	133x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48