ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 90G800A5XT

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90G800A5XT (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36C5
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170525
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '17 at 21:35
Run Duration	472 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 128 2-Core 244 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 698 75% 598 Pts	64-Core 697 43% 697 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3511) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.99 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 31.5 28% 30.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 32 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB 2,164 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 50 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 41 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 99 99 19 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 938 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 55 193274249251 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16756243 (F1) Unknown 99 99 126 (F2) Unknown 99 99 106 (F9) Unknown 99 99 128	101% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 491 Mixed 498 112% 502 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 22.1 136% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 90.5 109% 194 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 910GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 67 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 49 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 40 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 147 (C2) HDA temperature 114 107 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	98.7% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 165 Mixed 152 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.28 136% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 28GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 89.7 Write 11.3 Mixed 15.8 34% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.82 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.004 44% 3.06 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Read 16 Write 2.98 Mixed 4.02 7% 7.67 MB/s	4K Read 2.81 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.001 10% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 1x8GB 3,415 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.3 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback