Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 198
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 639
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 139
Parallax 243
108% 172 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 143
Splatting 90.8
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 1138 1262 1405 826 894 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,393
Mixed 946
SusWrite 1,180
274% 1,220 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 22
171% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 466
422% 644 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 208%
Great: 270%
Asgard AN3 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
46GB free
Firmware: FWSS0104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,393
Write 2,026
Mixed 192
337% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 75.2
258% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 518
447% 670 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 377%
SSD 4TB 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: VC0S1369
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 1039 1040 1054 1052 748 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,669
Write 1,008
Mixed 946
SusWrite 996
257% 1,155 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 52.3
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 572
458% 640 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 211%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 60 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM712A SAMSUNG
Typical Default string Builds (Compare 946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback