Hyrican H110M PRO-D

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hyrican H110M PRO-D (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161117
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '23 at 16:28
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 210 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 580 60% 484 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.9% Very good	Lighting 91.1 Reflection 153 Parallax 93.8 74% 113 fps	MRender 92.2 Gravity 93.7 Splatting 92.9 76% 92.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 240GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 20 30 10 43 60 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.1% Very poor	Read 246 Write 99.3 Mixed 99.1 SusWrite 28.7 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 11.5 20% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 52GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 97 98 98 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 6 Write 59.2 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 96.3 32% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 859B CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.9% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 19 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	28	144	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2401 24G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-D Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Hyrican H110M PRO-D

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	59x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	36x
Core i5-6600Intel $130Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	15x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
SP580 120GBAdataBench 54%, 3,644 samples	6x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 1,583 samples	23x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 3,127 samples	19x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 2,416 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16