Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 13:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 751
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 140 109 128 115 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.1% Very good
Read 256
Write 136
Mixed 161
SusWrite 126
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 47.8
148% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 182
174% 275 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
177GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 110
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1D2400C14 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback