Eurocom Neptune 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEurocom Neptune 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM Neptune 2.0
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 397
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 17.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 125 111 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 435
Write 113
Mixed 127
SusWrite 111
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 18.3
94% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 48.1
75% 149 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4,095
Mixed 14.7
1,468% 2,055 MB/s
4K Read 406
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.9
17,278% 137 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 43%
Unionsine USB3.0 320GB
271GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 22 22 23 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Generic External 500GB
278GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 51.1
Write 36.7
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 37.2
49% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04EF Team--Elite-1600 04EF Team--Elite-1600 WALRAM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0365
Typical Neptune 2.0 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Neptune 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback