MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 10:02
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 165
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 280
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 38.2
34% 42.6 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 326 349 385 388 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 396
Write 342
Mixed 346
SusWrite 355
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 30.3
95% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 245
188% 255 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
155GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 334 354 390 393 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 398
Write 336
Mixed 310
SusWrite 362
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 29.7
98% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 244
191% 265 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 97
SusWrite 88.6
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2400C15D4/16GX 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 207 55 60 24.5" 1920 1080 IVM6133 PL2530H
Typical H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 3,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback