Supermicro X10SLL-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X10SLL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SLL-F
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 07:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 278
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 101
55% 77.4 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 48
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 49 38 43 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.7% Poor
Read 163
Write 204
Mixed 115
SusWrite 53.8
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 8
36% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 7.8
23% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 101%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 16 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
232GB free
Firmware: 1S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 12 13 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 65" 1296 759 SNY7905 SONY TV *30
Typical X10SLL-F Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SLL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback