Lenovo 90W2000HUT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90W2000HUT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 333E
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 04:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 72.6
1-Core 193
2-Core 383
111% 216 Pts
4-Core 735
8-Core 1,171
117% 953 Pts
64-Core 1670
103% 1670 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 333E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 25.9
17% 23.8 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 28
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X113N 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51770C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1962 1908 1958 1962 1987 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,491
Write 1,680
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 1,947
368% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 39.7
193% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 716
504% 649 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 263%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27CA MZ279
Typical 90W2000HUT Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90W2000HUT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback