HP 810-170st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 810-170st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 19:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 592
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 243
Parallax 266
214% 257 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 220
Splatting 169
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 183%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 751 768 787 802 791 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 784
Mixed 618
SusWrite 772
180% 806 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 36.1
122% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 394
293% 386 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 144%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 37.1
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3538 HP Z27
Typical 810-170st Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-170st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback