Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 19:16
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 211
2-Core 394
120% 230 Pts
4-Core 815
8-Core 1,552
141% 1,184 Pts
64-Core 3,404
211% 3,404 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.37
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 143
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
Gravity 258
Splatting 186
192% 222 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2464 1946 1919 1926 1935 1954 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2805
Write 3,192
Mixed 3,052
SusWrite 2,024
625% 2,768 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 92.3
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,627
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,550
1,150% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 401%
Great: 477%
USB3.0 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 20 44 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 244
Write 85.9
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 47.3
25% 116 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 9.5
37% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 14.9
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%
Wd_black SN750 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 112000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2332 1716 1496 1500 1497 1497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 2,324
Mixed 1,779
SusWrite 1673
436% 1,931 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 64.4
241% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,426
DQ Mixed 1,618
1,194% 1,574 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 323%
Great: 347%
Seagate FireCuda Hub 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 165 161 165 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 115
Write 155
Mixed 108
SusWrite 168
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
397% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 138 135 138 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 78
SusWrite 136
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 98%
USB3.0 250GB
58GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 20 44 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 34.2
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 47.4
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 47%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
231GB free
Firmware: AV001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 116 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 115
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 73.3
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 63
191% 66.8 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 64.6
SC Mixed 58.4
168% 58.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 183%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 2560 1440 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback