Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive476% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory49.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 18:57
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 321
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,081
103% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,024
125% 2,024 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 113
Parallax 116
103% 119 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 85.5
84% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 367 351 368 363 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 364
Mixed 396
SusWrite 369
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 48.9
150% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 224
168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 136%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$135
970GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3447 3583 3417 2436 2245 1881 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 3,964
Write 4,152
Mixed 2,450
SusWrite 2,835
753% 3,350 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 69.4
258% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,640
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 1,509
1,119% 1,485 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 476%
Great: 666%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
733GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3199 2999 3163 3047 2918 2952 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 1709
Write 3,152
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 3,046
549% 2,411 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 68.9
226% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1405
1,045% 1,386 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 386%
Great: 472%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
876GB free
Firmware: O1026A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 352 339 355 350 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 407
Mixed 284
SusWrite 354
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 31.5
109% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 171
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 178 179 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 101
Write 145
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 178
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 31 31 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 67%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 229 224 233 233 228 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 232
Mixed 114
SusWrite 230
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
351% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-16GTZN 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 31.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 24.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 VSC3236 VA2456 Series
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback