Asus X541UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus X541UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541UV
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 88
40% 67 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 166
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 12F0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 5.7
4% 6.53 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 9.5
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 222 141 252 261 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 226
Write 248
Mixed 224
SusWrite 222
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 8.6
43% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 29.8
68% 141 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44%
Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
623GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 104
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 95.3
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1366 768 BOE0757
Typical X541UV Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback