Intel X79F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79F  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 74.8
43% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 163
16% 133 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Nvidia(10DE 1522) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 110
Parallax 117
95% 114 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 100
Splatting 86.5
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 120 119 116 171 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 214
Write 194
Mixed 196
SusWrite 129
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 13.7
61% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 21.1
24% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 37%
Great: 102%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
180GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 56 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 67.4
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 56.2
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
415GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 102 125 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 112
Mixed 52
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5270CH0- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical X79F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback