Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2020M 9,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 36.5 31% 42.2 Pts	4-Core 40.7 8-Core 39.6 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 40.7 2% 40.7 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9994) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 173 60 81 51 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 302 Write 225 Mixed 144 SusWrite 95.1 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 9.6 18% 6.9 MB/s	DQ Read 81.9 DQ Write 68.3 DQ Mixed 65.9 52% 72 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HD0NS-CG 1x4GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.9 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	33	11	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD039F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	277x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	219x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	214x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	597x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	321x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	190x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	103x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	84x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x

RAM
CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,135 samples	130x
M2S8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 30%, 565 samples	80x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16