Dell Precision T1700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T1700
MotherboardDell Precision T1700  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130603
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 00:46
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 196
62% 114 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 332
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
189GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 208 209 210 300 223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 341
Write 168
Mixed 215
SusWrite 243
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 25.3
96% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 207
177% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 95 102 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 108
Write 118
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 97.3
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 43 10 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Precision T1700 Builds (Compare 2,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback