Asrock FM2A78M-DG3+

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A78M-DG3+ (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141215
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '23 at 21:26
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 71 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 99.5 48% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 160 19% 148 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 9901) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 7.1 6% 7.5 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 250 251 253 251 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 396 Write 258 Mixed 168 SusWrite 250 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 23.4 90% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 76.3 98% 176 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 199GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 342 334 335 340 341 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 276 Write 288 Mixed 238 SusWrite 336 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 25.4 84% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 37.9 33% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB 7,244 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29% Poor	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 10.5 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	0"	1600 1200	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A78M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-DG3+

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	2x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
M6S 256GBPlextor $166Bench 89%, 1,660 samples	1x

RAM
9905584-025.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 43 samples	1x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	1x
Value DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 30%, 2,811 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16