Asus X550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus X550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JK
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 170
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 400
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 16.9
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 14.9
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$31
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 117 28 47 52 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 474
Write 390
Mixed 404
SusWrite 91.5
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 23.7
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 50.5
98% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 29% 21 190 59 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO42EC
Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback