Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 724
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.9% Good
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 83.9
59% 83.3 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 70.6
64% 80 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 476 638 486 432 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 814
Mixed 719
SusWrite 557
155% 684 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 36.6
129% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 784
574% 753 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 132%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 30 84.6" 1296 759 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback