HP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8954
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 18:22
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 350
109% 205 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,032
102% 830 Pts
64-Core 1211
75% 1211 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 51.2
42% 53.3 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 45.9
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFK-1BC1AABHA 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSV040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2036 2167 2228 1345 1202 611 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 3,032
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1,598
445% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 61.8
219% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,413
DQ Write 1,208
DQ Mixed 1,299
976% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 287%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 17" 1280 720 PHL0856 Philips 170S
Typical Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback