Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 468%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 625%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics389% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 232
2-Core 473
133% 262 Pts
4-Core 925
8-Core 1,832
163% 1,379 Pts
64-Core 4,108
254% 4,108 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
389% Outstanding
Lighting 623
Reflection 583
Parallax 713
508% 640 fps
MRender 531
Gravity 572
Splatting 303
367% 469 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 389%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 480 484 484 483 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 477
Mixed 461
SusWrite 482
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 50.1
163% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 340
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 53.6
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 30.9
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 143%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 173.5" 1280 720 CLB2770 fitHeadless4k
Typical Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 595%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback