Metabox Aer NV41PNK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMetabox Aer NV41PNK  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NV4xPNKPNJPNH
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 93
2-Core 152
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 324
35% 276 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 4040) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 23
Parallax 24.9
18% 23.2 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.4
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBK00104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 983 1114 1144 1688 2119 2016 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,563
Write 1478
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 1,510
324% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 28.8
140% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 613
451% 591 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 222%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14" 1536 864 BOE079F
Typical Aer NV41PNK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Metabox Aer NV41PNK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback