MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 269%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics305% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C22
MotherboardMSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)  (all builds)
Memory90.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 05:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,032
96% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
PNY(196E 13BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 452
Parallax 493
372% 467 fps
MRender 583
Gravity 390
Splatting 279
326% 417 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 305%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 200 212 218 218 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 453
Write 403
Mixed 282
SusWrite 219
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 38.6
142% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 229
190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CD F4-3200C16-32GVK 86D3 04CD F4-3200C16-32GVK 95GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22) Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback