Positivo H14CU01

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo H14CU01 (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo H14CU01
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131203
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '23 at 19:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 114 55% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 162 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1297 2033) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.67 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227O SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 42 8.3 44 11 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 434 Write 344 Mixed 278 SusWrite 39.4 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 11.3 71% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 95.1 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 14.8 60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 90%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 9GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 50 50 50 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 36.8 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 50.5 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 0194 SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	21	33	24	60	13.9"	1366 768	BOE05B1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H14CU01 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo H14CU01

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	8x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	1x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16