Clevo P15xEMx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemClevo P15xEMx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P15xEMx
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 149
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 374
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 132 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67% Good
Read 237
Write 223
Mixed 207
SusWrite 147
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 36.9
129% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 144
122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
699GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 96
Write 85.2
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 94.5
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 13 0 0" 1280 720
Typical P15xEMx Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P15xEMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback