Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 11:58
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 191
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 556
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 85.8
50% 73.2 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 60.7
58% 71.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 310 331 337 333 337 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 348
Write 323
Mixed 160
SusWrite 315
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 21.2
89% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 66.9
102% 196 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 89%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 243 239 245 245 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 54.7
Write 142
Mixed 172
SusWrite 242
35% 153 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 23.1
89% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 60.6
82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 89%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 242 240 245 245 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 52.4
Write 138
Mixed 163
SusWrite 242
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 25.5
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 60.3
82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 89%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 151 154 152 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 141
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 152
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 26.1" 1280 720 DID0000 DID-DVI-FHD
Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback