Acer Aspire A515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Doc_IL
Memory12.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 03:53
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 152
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 233
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1429) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.17 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 725
Write 911
Mixed 732
177% 789 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 43.7
154% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 118
159% 284 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 23 79 55 60 21.7" 1360 768 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical Aspire A515-55 Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback