Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 23:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 249
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 777
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 149
Parallax 150
123% 150 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 128
Splatting 116
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK25 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K8DC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 156 143 139 199 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 360
Write 128
Mixed 166
SusWrite 151
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 26.5
92% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 144
140% 228 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%
Samsung MZ7KM480 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: GXM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 350 372 430 452 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 406
Mixed 393
SusWrite 408
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 40.6
119% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 359
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
Samsung MZ7KM480 480GB
32GB free
Firmware: GXM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 228 181 192 199 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 457
Write 317
Mixed 342
SusWrite 199
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 40.5
136% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 323
248% 339 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 109 107 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 79.4
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 108
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 34.9
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 25.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 14% 135 215 59 165 27" 1280 720 SAM7181 LS27AG500N
Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback