MSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 278%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 289%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics317% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D09
MotherboardMSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09)  (all builds)
Memory51.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 18:40
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 326
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,061
100% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,555
96% 1,555 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
317% Outstanding
Lighting 506
Reflection 460
Parallax 632
412% 532 fps
MRender 422
Gravity 462
Splatting 234
292% 373 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 317%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,715
Write 1,860
Mixed 1,568
383% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 60.7
204% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 1,052
801% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 349%
SSK Storage 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 705 704 697 707 714 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 73%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
58GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,885
Write 1,829
Mixed 1,611
396% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 58.7
188% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 622
590% 934 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
5GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 154
Mixed 73.8
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
62GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 105 108 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 107
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 96 93 106 99 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 101
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-32GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3600C18-32GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 95GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27.2" 3840 2160 GSM5B9A 27GN950
Typical Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09) Builds (Compare 9,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09) - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback