Acer Spin SP114-31N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Spin SP114-31N  (all builds)
MotherboardJSL Airking_JL
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 106
43% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 126
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1531) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 290 348 258 173 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 875
Write 936
Mixed 817
SusWrite 278
163% 727 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 30.5
98% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 200
150% 204 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 216%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 28 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO403D
Typical Spin SP114-31N Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Spin SP114-31N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback