Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 16:05
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 566
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 28
16% 21.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 14
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 500GB SSD 500GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1648
Write 1,423
Mixed 1,135
312% 1402 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 43.7
198% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 628
516% 739 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 246%
Jmicron Tech 128GB
75GB free
Firmware: 3202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 41.4
Write 37.6
Mixed 39
9% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 9.6
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
4% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-16GB-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 18.5" 1280 720 ACR032A Acer V196HQL
Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback