HP ZBook 17 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D6
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 08:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 40.6
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 132
44% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 342
35% 281 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
HP(103C 80D6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 5.5
4% 21.2 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 10
5% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 165 169 173 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 316
Write 164
Mixed 156
SusWrite 164
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 9.6
45% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 73.4
81% 136 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 58 60 17.2" 1600 900 AUO119E
Typical ZBook 17 G3 Builds (Compare 1,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback