Lenovo F0D7001AIN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0D7001AIN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36ED
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 21:12
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 34.6
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 70.4
32% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 73.4
8-Core 74.5
10% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 89.8
6% 89.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 36ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 61 43 82 96 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 80.8
Write 105
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 68.5
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GS2400.C8ET 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 28 60 0" 1280 720 LEN0017 LEN-A3/V1-E
Typical F0D7001AIN Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0D7001AIN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback