Ms-z87m MS-Z87M-G43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMs-z87m MS-Z87M-G43  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z87M-G43 (MS-7823)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 534
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 83.8
48% 68 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 44.8
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 146 148 148 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 407
Write 346
Mixed 152
SusWrite 146
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 21.4
88% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 109
92% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 137 140 138 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 138
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB
2TB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 56.5
Write 24.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 27.9
40% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 27" 1280 720 AUS27D2 ASUS VA27EHE
Typical MS-Z87M-G43 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Ms-z87m MS-Z87M-G43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback