Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V23.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V23.1
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U29, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 188
2-Core 370
109% 211 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,213
119% 975 Pts
64-Core 1955
121% 1955 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A650) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 203
Parallax 136
147% 173 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 114
Splatting 93.2
107% 138 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00B07 1TB
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 663 1860 1915 2031 2041 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 733
Mixed 502
SusWrite 1501
212% 942 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 46.7
163% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 351
407% 707 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 222%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 49.3
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 27.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 135%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE08B3
Typical TULPAR T5 V23.1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback