Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory183.4 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 17:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 67.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 336
98% 190 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,271
112% 951 Pts
64-Core 5,809
360% 5,809 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 193
Parallax 172
144% 181 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 133
Splatting 133
121% 151 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 129%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,852
Write 3,270
Mixed 2,997
682% 3,040 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 93.6
301% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,145
851% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 6x31.8GB
6 of 8 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 120
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 38.2
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 35.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 169%
Great: 230%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback