Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '17 at 01:00
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Memory 96.9 1-Core 136 2-Core 273 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 535 8-Core 887 87% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,077 67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2941 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 166 Parallax 158 134% 163 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 154 Splatting 121 109% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 726 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 51 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 80 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6010807971	107% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 414 Mixed 424 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 50.2 186% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 47.3 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 28.5 36% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 131%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 92GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3710761 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2422361557395 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1258 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 323 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 22 43 21477654550 (C2) HDA temperature 22 43 21477654550 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3710761 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3710761 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3710761 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1125 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1250 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1250 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2314 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2424858	66.7% Good	Read 514 Write 129 Mixed 140 56% 261 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 16.8 118% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 73.7 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 13.2 34% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 92GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2964 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1530 (B1) Unknown 97 97 60 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 48 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 189 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23201719180	99.8% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 411 Mixed 421 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 28.8 159% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 48.4 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 28.2 60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 216847243 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 251 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3520195 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 517 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 221 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 471597084 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 252 (C2) HDA temperature 28 3 12884901916 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 8 1 216847243 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 15272903705086 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2038677061 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1617038876	100% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 159 Mixed 142 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.31 108% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 20 (03) Spinup time 116 100 7200 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5621 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5558 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 720 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 146925 (C2) HDA temperature 120 94 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.3% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 97 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.41 95% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 57%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: ZM100-34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5632 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 15006 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9018 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7770 (BE) vendor-specific 145 73 31 (C2) HDA temperature 145 73 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6529 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	35.4% Below average	Read 60.1 Write 62.8 Mixed 61.3 46% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.43 104% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 43.8 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 25.4 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	354x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16