Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '23 at 12:52
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 219 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 634 63% 514 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.35 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.8% Above average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 60.2 52% 63.3 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 60.9 52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 122 82 68 99 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 432 Write 381 Mixed 271 SusWrite 143 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 8.4 72% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 15.1 48% 103 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 344GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 129 132 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 143 Write 106 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 130 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 114%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 11GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 236 Write 180 Mixed 62.5 182% 159 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 7.9 681% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 10.5 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 9 723% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76.7% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.2 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 23.5 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	45	8	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0D90 S27E330

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X4701 D/C446 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GB240gbBench 60%, 2,356 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $286

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16