TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 06:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 312
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 908
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 96.7%
 Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Asus(1043 05D3)
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 132
Parallax 223
91% 156 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 119
Splatting 180
140% 171 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 960 877 827 840 1116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 772
Mixed 2,242
SusWrite 970
337% 1507 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 43.4
170% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,208
883% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 242%
 Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 59.3%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 27" 1280 720 ACR079A KA272 A
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples945x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples638x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples403x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples378x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples279x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples257x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples201x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples150x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples85x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair  $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples66x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback